Bad Signage

little pooper

(photo by E. Herd)

This is one of the many dog decoys that litter the lawns of some buildings in Hackensack, New Jersey that I pass on the bus ride home. I think it sends a mixed message. First of all, I didn’t know dogs could read (sign says, “NO!”). Second of all, since the doggie decoy is squatting to poop, wouldn’t a real dog mimic his fake brethren’s behavior? It only makes sense. And another thing, isn’t positive reinforcement more effective? I suppose the sign is intended for the owners, but don’t they already know their dogs aren’t supposed to unload on neighboring lawns?

What do you think? Any bad signage in your neck of the woods?

7 thoughts on “Bad Signage

  1. It helps to see the sign through a dog’s eyes. For instance, my dog Scooter reads quite well and understands that NO! means NO!. But obviously, the NO! belongs to the doggie decoy, which means the bush would belong to Scooter.

    Liked by 2 people

Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.